- Home
- Server Administration
- Advanced Solutions of Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 (70-342)
36.
You have the following retention tags. You need to create a policy that will ensure that
messages in the Deleted Items folder are kept for two weeks, and messages over two
years old are archived. You also need to ensure that the mailbox and archive do not
hold messages that are over five years old. Which of the following tags do you add to
your policy? (Choose all that apply.)
- A.Name: "Keep Deleted Items for 2 Weeks"; AgeLimitForRetention:2; RetentionAction: DeleteAndAllowRecovery;Type=DeletedItems
- B.Name: "Keep Deleted Items for 2 Weeks"; AgeLimitForRetention:14; RetentionAction: DeleteAndAllowRecovery;Type=DeletedItems
- C.Name: "Archive After Two Years"; AgeLimitForRetention:730; RetentionAction: MoveToArchive;Type=All
- D.Name: "Archive After Two Years"; AgeLimitForRetention:730; RetentionAction: MoveToArchive;Type=Mailbox
- E.Name: "Delete After Five Years"; AgeLimitForRetention:1826; RetentionAction: PermanentlyDelete;Type=All
- F.Name: "Delete After Five Years"; AgeLimitForRetention:1095; RetentionAction: PermanentlyDelete;Type=All
- Answer & Explanation
- Report
Answer : [B, C, E]
Explanation :
Explanation :
|
A. Incorrect: The AgeLimitForRetention is a counter set in days, therefore two days is
not sufficient for this solution. B. Correct: These are the correct settings for the Deleted Items requirement. C. Correct: These are the correct settings for the Archive requirement. D. Incorrect: This tag uses an incorrect Type value. E. Correct: These are the correct settings for the Delete After Five Years (1826 days) requirement. F. Incorrect: This retention policy value of 1095 days is only for three years. The two-year move to archive is independent of the five-year delete, and is not added together to get a five-year delete. |
37.
How many retention policies can you apply to a mailbox?
- A.One
- B.Two, one archive policy and one delete policy
- C.Three, one archive and two delete
- D.As many as your business requirement needs
- Answer & Explanation
- Report
Answer : [A]
Explanation :
Explanation :
|
A. Correct: Each mailbox can only have one retention policy. B. Incorrect: You can create one archive tag that applies to a mailbox, and one deletion tag that applies to the same, but these are tags and not policies as asked by the question. Incorrect: Do not mix up retention tags and retention policies. You can have one policy with the number of tags that you need in it. D. Incorrect: Do not mix up retention tags and retention policies. You can have one policy with the number of tags that you need in it. |
38.
You need to enable journaling and Legal Hold to ensure your compliance scenario.
Why is this?
- A.Because Legal Hold only tracks items in Exchange that are not delivered as messages, and journaling keeps a copy of all messages.
- B.Because Legal Hold will show you all of the messages, but not the actual recipients at the time the message was sent.
- C.Journaling only works to external third-party storage, and so eDiscovery searches allow you to query Exchange Server before you query the third-party service.
- D.Because journaling only stores the data on a single mailbox database, and therefore the performance of searching this mailbox is poor.
- Answer & Explanation
- Report
Answer : [B]
Explanation :
Explanation :
|
A. Incorrect: Both journaling and Legal Hold are able to copy all items. B. Correct: Prior to CU7 (the IT Pro exam is not based on this later release) the only way to do recipients at time of message is journaling. C. Incorrect: Both can store data in Exchange on-premises. D. Incorrect: Search is based on the Exchange indexes, so performance is not based on the size of the database. Though a large mailbox is more likely to return extra results and take longer to export, the fact that journaling can be split across many databases means performance can be improved if required. |
39.
How would you ensure that the trusted members of your help desk that deal with the
company executives are able to do eDiscovery searches on those mailboxes, and other
help desk members are not?
- A.You cannot segregate these roles.
- B.You would deny membership of the Discovery Management role group to those members of the Executives group.
- C.You would place the executives on Office 365, and the remaining mailboxes onpremises because you cannot search across both environments.
- D.You would create a custom exclusive scope for discovery searches, and add the trusted employees to the role group that uses this exclusive scope.
- Answer & Explanation
- Report
Answer : [D]
Explanation :
Explanation :
|
A. Incorrect: You can segregate these roles. Custom scopes in RBAC will allow this. B. Incorrect: You cannot deny someone membership of a group to block their access to what the group can do. C. Incorrect: eDiscovery searches in Exchange Hybrid are cross-forest, and so a search on-premises can include Office 365 mailboxes, and visa versa. Correct: The exclusive scope would ensure that only the executive help desk team could manage the executives, including discovery searches. |
40.
What will the “(alpha NEAR beta NOT gamma) AND (alpha NEAR omega)” search keyword
find? (Choose two.)
- A.Alpha Beta Gamma Omega
- B.Alpha Beta
- C.Alpha Omega
- D.Alpha Beta Omega
- E.Alpha Omega Beta Zeta
- Answer & Explanation
- Report
Answer : [D, E]
Explanation :
Explanation :
|
A. Incorrect: This “message” contains “gamma” and the search says not to include
“gamma.” B. Incorrect: This search does not include “omega” and the query requires “omega” near “alpha.” C. Incorrect: This search does not include “beta” and the query requires “beta” near “alpha.” D. Correct: This search includes the required keywords. E. Correct: This search includes the required keywords. The additional words do not take away from the result set. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
